|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
59
   |
Posted - 2015.06.25 09:46:30 -
[1] - Quote
In general I have no objection to this idea, however in order to be implemented, looting mechanics (at least) need to be fixed (namely DST fleet hangar mechanic).
Otherwise its just a stealth buff to gankers who (obviously) are getting a bit hurt in their backs due to the fact that some of the folks fighting them actually started popping the wrecks (as they - the gankers, suggested in one thread  ).
So -1 atm, with +1 potential. Also, numbers need to be worked on a bit (tone them down maybe). |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
59
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 10:25:24 -
[2] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:
I think it is not hard to block moving cargo to fleet hangar based on crime watch mechanic.
Unfortunately, it is. You might not live in hisec, but this change would definitely be a giant buff to efficiency of freighter ganking. |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
61
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 18:00:59 -
[3] - Quote
Trader Bongo McButtStash wrote:Actually, this wouldn't effect freighters getting ganked period, just the loot retrieval after the fact. This does not prevent anything from dying any less often than it currently does.  Unfortunately, people are letting personal motives get in the way of changes that would mean a lot to a ton of different parts of the game for other people. A titan that has 100 million EHP shouldn't be able to have it's wreck popped by one bullet. Just my .02
Not sure but seriously doubt titans have 100 mil EHP in any configuration. Also, I too used to like posting on alts. |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
61
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 20:48:25 -
[4] - Quote
Nyalnara wrote:Been fiddling with Pyfa, easily go up to 50M.
Yes, 'easily' consisting of titan links, T2 trimarks, HG Slaves, and purple fit. Now double that somehow, please.  |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
61
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 20:50:02 -
[5] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:ugly inside wrote:
take paper.. now punch paper.. it might have a hole in it if done right. take wood.. punch wood... now detonate dynomite next to wood.. now punch the wood chips.. take a gun.. shoot a jeep.. now blow the jeep up.. now shoot the jeep with the same gun.. things lose their structural integrity when they kinda lose their frame work. have you seen the wrecks up close. look like Picasso work for metal art.
I can only think of something like a black hole that could completely destroy a car and remove it from the universe (and even then, its not truly destroyed). So what youre saying is it should take a doomsday volley to completely remove a wreck from the game?
Ok, then a counter-proposal - on destroying wreck it turns into some salvage you can scoop. Less then you can get using the salvager though. There, mystery and problem solved. |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
62
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 11:49:21 -
[6] - Quote
Trader Bongo McButtStash wrote:
Please, at least do your homework if you're going to pretend to know things.
I don't know much about titans, never claimed to, and as I said - not sure but seriously doubt 100mil ehp. It seems I made a mistake, my bad.
To explain where the mistake came from - I did my EFT-ing with avatar in eft, with avatar as booster (didn't know erebus was better) and did not overheat harders, so ye, it can actually go for a burst tank of over 100mil EHP (2 minutes 20 seconds before hardeners burning out).
BTW, either something's wrong with my EFT or yours since I could not get your 72 mil on levi if I fit a clear pilot (no implants) and no boosters on the exact same fit (I get 65 mil ehp). Either way, it could be argued that EHP is irrelevant for the wreck as its very dependent on the situation (as this disscussion has shown) and once the wreck pops only its base HP value should count.
EDIT: All the EFT warrioring aside, I stand by my comments on the wreck changes (-1 atm) |
Rhamnousia Nosferatu
Omar Little Fan Club
62
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 18:21:33 -
[7] - Quote
Jin Kugu wrote:
Your personal feelings towards certain groups are not a reason to stop good changes.
Neither should yours feeling or vested interests be reason to promote bad changes, Jin Blam. At least I don't try to hide behind easily traceable atls when trying to appear 'non-biased'.
Anyway, had you read this thread from the beginning you would have seen that I have no problem with such a change in case of changing looting mechanics which allow for 100% safe looting using DST hanger. |
|
|
| |
|